Utah’s 7 Deadliest Intersections & 5 Most Hazardous Highways

Looking at crash data and local reporting, the following 12 locations consistently emerge as Utah’s most dangerous traffic hotspots. We’ve broken them down into seven intersections and five highways, sharing what types of crashes occur, why they’re so dangerous, and where they happen. At the end of each section, you’ll find information about our free case review for drivers, passengers, cyclists, or pedestrians affected by these accidents.

Utah’s 7 Deadliest Intersections

If you or a loved one has been involved in a vehicle accident, it’s important to understand your options and seek assistance. Our team is here to help you navigate the challenges that follow a crash.

Need help after a crash? We provide a free case review for accidents on I‑15, including multi-vehicle pile-ups and winter crashes. Have questions? Call us today at 1-888‑657‑1460.

1. Redwood Road & 4100 South to 5400 South, West Valley City

• 2024 collision count: over 120 crashes, mostly rear-end and angle collisions during daily commutes
• Hazards: High speeds on Redwood Road (45–55 mph), short yellow/green signal timings, and multiple turn lanes without protected phases
• Context: Busy traffic corridor serving retail centers, gas stations, and an Amazon distribution hub, traffic cameras repeatedly show what the Federal Highway Administration named leading causes of car accidents, such as vehicles stopping abruptly or running red lights
• Why it matters: Sudden stops combined with heavy commuter traffic create dangerous rear-impact and side-angle collisions
• After a crash here: Signal timing reports and scene photos matter for liability

2. State Street & 7200 South, Midvale

• Annual crash average: approximately 95, including frequent right-hook pedestrian incidents
• Hazards: Complex lane configurations mixing light-rail feeder buses, narrow pedestrian refuges, and confusing turn signals
• Context: Busy urban intersection surrounded by Midvale Main Street, TRAX station, and neighborhoods; heavy walking/biking traffic, and photographers report near-miss pedestrian incidents almost daily
• Why it matters: Tight merging spaces encourage abrupt lane changes, and signal sequencing leaves pedestrians vulnerable
• After a crash here, Witness reports and bus/tram schedules help establish fault

3. I‑15 & Center Street, Provo

• Total crashes since 2013: 400 (at least) incidents, many during UVU rush and university events
• Hazards: High-speed off-ramp merges with a short deceleration distance and a tight turning radius
• Context: Adjacent to Utah Valley University, fast-food routes, and residential areas, coffee-shop traffic adds to weaving chaos
• Why it matters: Vehicles merging too fast or failing to brake early cause rear-end and loss-of-control crashes
• After a crash, here: Ramp design, visibility, and signage are key to understanding liability

4. 3300 South & 700 East, Salt Lake City

• Collision count (3 years): 80+ crashes, including serious injury-causing T-bones
• Hazards: Wide east-west road with high pedestrian volume near schools and poor nighttime lighting
• Context: Near Hidden Valley Elementary, community facilities, heavy jaywalking, and bus stops combine with dark streets
• Why it matters: Clear-line emergencies, drivers sometimes misjudge pedestrian speed, or lighting interferes with visibility
• After a crash here: Pedestrian lighting and school-zone speed limits are central to fault discussions

5. 4500 South & 900 East, Millcreek Township

• Annual crashes: approximately 70, with many side-impact collisions
• Hazards: Offset crosswalks, no protected left-turn signals, and shopping center traffic
• Context: Busy with drivers from retailers like Walmart and Home Depot; cut-through lanes cause confusion
• Why it matters: Ambiguous signal timing increases angle collision risk
• After a crash here: Design plans and signage need review to identify correctness

6. 6200 South & 900 East, Murray

• Crashes (2023): 65+, including bicycle-vehicle collisions
• Hazards: Heavy cyclist traffic, but inconsistent bike lane continuity
• Context: Popular biking route to Murray Park; uneven shoulder design and low visibility
• Why it matters: Mixed vehicle-bicycle lanes present collision risks
• After a crash here: Accident reconstruction and lane marking reviews are key

7. 2100 South & 900 East, Salt Lake City

• Crashes per year: approximately 60, mainly rear-end pileups
• Hazards: Signal favoring 900 E creates abrupt stops, compounded by sightline issues due to parked vehicles
• Context: Near businesses and walk-ups; sudden traffic slowdowns are not visible until it’s too late
• Why it matters: Unexpected stoppages at speed trigger chain-reaction crashes
• After a crash here: Sightline studies and rear-end damage patterns are critical

Utah’s 5 Most Hazardous Highways

1. Interstate 15 (I‑15), Salt Lake Corridor

• Crash volume (2016–2019): 914+ crashes recorded on the Salt Lake portion alone
• Hazards: High speeds, winter pile-ups, frequent construction zones, and dense commuter traffic
• Context: Major corridor linking Salt Lake City suburbs (mix of cars, trucks, semis)
• Why it matters: Construction narrows lanes, causes sudden slowdowns; winter weather and chain-reaction crashes are common
• After a crash here: Witness accounts, dashcam footage, and UDOT work-zone logs help establish fault

2. Interstate 80 (I‑80), High-Altitude Winter Corridor

• Safety ranking: Among the state’s top three interstates for annual fatal collisions
• Hazards: Sudden weather changes and black ice cause rollovers and head-on crashes in Parleys and Emigration Canyons
• Context: Mountain pass with steep grades, vulnerable to hidden ice patches and chain collisions
• Why it matters: Poor visibility and unpredictable traction loss cause severe outcomes
• After a crash here: Busy interstate, but crash-report analysis of black ice and weather data is essential

3. US Highway 89, Scenic but Dangerous

• Crash ranking: Among the top five crash rates per vehicle-mile in Davis and Weber counties
• Hazards: Undivided two-lane road with mixed RV traffic and tourist congestion around the national park access
• Context: Near Antelope Island and national forest tourist spots, sudden braking and run-off highway crashes are common
• Why it matters: The lack of passing lanes and line-of-sight blind spots worsens collision risk
• After a crash here: Traffic volume, driver-behavior profiles, and road design history matter

4. Bangerter Highway (SR‑154), Rapid Suburban Growth Hub

• Safety designation: Labeled a “high injury corridor” in the 2023 UDOT report
• Hazards: Rapid suburban expansion, short acceleration lanes, angle and rear-end collisions at signalized nodes
• Context: Connects suburbs like Taylorsville and Draper; high traffic volume, but state-route infrastructure
• Why it matters: Turn signals are not always calibrated for traffic volume; adjacent shopping centers add stop-start patterns
• After a crash here: Engineering studies and signal timing logs are part of the case review

5. Redwood Road Corridor (SR‑68), Truck Route Turn Hazard

• Safety ranking: Among the top five injury corridors in local studies
• Hazards: Heavy truck traffic, short intersection clearance, frequent near-miss incidents, and rear impacts
• Context: Runs parallel to I-15 with inconsistent clearance timing; retail stretch adds turning conflicts
• Why it matters: Trucks require longer launch times and space; passenger vehicles often misjudge distance
• After a crash here: Truck logs, clearance study data, and lane-sharing dynamics are critical

Why This List Matters to You

Making data-driven choices is essential when it comes to understanding and addressing roadway safety. By analyzing UDOT crash statistics, utilizing CollisionCam, and reviewing local police reports, we can gain valuable insights into the factors that contribute to accidents in our area.

Local landmarks, such as schools, universities, retail centers, and residential zones, play a significant role in shaping crash dynamics. These environments influence traffic patterns and behaviors, making it crucial to consider their impact when assessing safety measures and accident prevention strategies.

Our crash type insights are tailored to provide a deeper understanding of the various incidents that occur on the roads, including rear-end collisions, angle crashes, run-off accidents, and multi-vehicle pileups. With this information, you can receive tailored reporting that addresses the specific risks in your area.

Moreover, we recognize that navigating the aftermath of a collision can be overwhelming. That’s why we offer more than just statistics; we provide free case reviews and assist you in connecting with local lawyers who specialize in these types of environments. Our goal is to ensure you have the support and legal guidance you need during challenging times.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How were these locations selected?
A: These locations were selected based on 2023–2024 crash data from UDOT, DPS, local law enforcement, CollisionCam, and local news reports. The selection highlights the worst crash frequency and high severity.

Q: What if I was a passenger or cyclist?
A: You may still have a valid claim; these locations include vehicle, pedestrian, cyclist, and passenger incidents.

Q: Is it necessary to take legal action?
A: Even if your injuries seem minor, addressing them early through a free case review helps ensure fair compensation for current and future damages.

Take the Next Step if You’ve Been Affected

If you or someone you know has been involved in a crash at one of these hazardous locations in Utah, don’t let confusing signal timing, poor weather conditions, or unclear signage prevent you from seeking help. Take advantage of our free case review today; there’s no obligation.

At Local Accident Reports, we provide up-to-date traffic accident news from across Utah. If you have questions, call us at 1-888‑657‑1460 to connect with attorneys who understand local crash patterns and can assist you in pursuing the compensation you deserve.